Science Direct Science  Direct Science   Direct Science    Direct

Science     Direct

Numerical simulation on magnetic flux leakage evaluation at high speed
 Homepage   page 1    page 2     page 3      page 4     page 5      page 6     page 7     page 8     page 9

Further work will focus on the development of the proposed high-speed MFL inspection system, which involves: probe design and optimisation based on 3D numerical simulation; Feature extraction from MFL signal and defect characterization by using signal processing techniques and artificial neural networks for inversion algorithms at high speed measurement.
References
[1] Bray Don E, Stanley Roderic K. Nondestructive evaluation—a tool in design, manufacturing, and service. West Palm Beach, FL: CRC Press; 1997. p. 215–427.
[2] Haines Harvey. Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) technology for natural gas pipeline inspection; 1999. http://www.battelle.org/pipetechnology/MFL/, 1999.
[3] Miya Kenzo. Recent advancement of electromagnetic nondestructive inspection technology in Japan. IEEE Trans Magn 2002;38(2):321–6.
[4] Burd John. Magnetic flux leakage old and new, magnetics in nondestructive testing. One day seminar proceedings of magnetics in nondestructive testing; April 2005. p. 8–13.
[5] Drury JC, Pearson N. Corrosion detection in ferrite steels using magnetic flux leakage. One day seminar proceedings of magnetics in nondestructive testing; April 2005. p. 14–9.
[6] Ireland RC, Torres CR. Limitations of the circumferential MFL technique in the NDE of pipelines. One day seminar proceedings of magnetics in non-destructive testing; April 2005. p. 1–7.
[7] Mandayam S, Udpa L, Udpa SS, Lord W. Invariance transformations for magnetic flux leakage signals. IEEE Trans Magn 1996;32(3):1577–80.
[8] Bruce Nestleroth J. Implementing current in-line inspection technologies on crawler systems. Technology status report, http://www.netl.doe.gov/; April 2004. p. 1–14. Fig. 8. Proposed high-speed MFL inspection system with three sensor arrays. Y. Li et al. / NDT&E International 372 39 (2006) 367–373
[9] Joyner Michele L, Banks HT, Wincheski Buzz, Winfree William P. Nondestructive evaluation using a reduced order computational methodology. NASA/CR-2000-209870 ICASE Report No. 2000-10; Inverse problems (16); 2000. p. 929–45.
[10] Yang S, Sun Y, Udpa L, Udpa SS, Lord W. 3D simulation of velocity induced fields for non-destructive evaluation application. IEEE Trans Magn 1999;35(3):1754–6.
[11] Dai Xiao-Wei, Ludwig Reinhold, Palanisamy R. Numerical simulation of pulsed eddy-current nondestructive testing phenomena. IEEE Trans Magn 1990;26(6):3089–96.
[12] Tsuboi Hajime, Seshima Norio, Sebestyen Imre, Pavo Josef, Gyimothy Szabolcs, Gasparics Antal. Transient eddy current analysis of pulsed eddy current by finite element method. IEEE Trans Magn 2004; 40(2):1330–3.
[13] Ida Nathan, Lord William. A finite element model for three-dimensional eddy current NDT phenomena. IEEE Trans Magn 1985;MAG-21(6): 2635–43.
[14] Haueisen Jens, Unger Ralf, Beuker Thomas, Bellemann Matthias E. Evaluation of inverse algorithms in the analysis of magnetic flux leakage data. IEEE Trans Magn 2002;38(3):1481–8.
[15] Klimpke Bruce. A hybrid magnetic field solver using a combined finite element/boundary element field solver. Presented at the UK magnetics society conference. Advanced electromagnetic modelling & CAD for industrial application; Feb 19, 2003. p. 1–8.
[16] Sabariego RV, Gyselinck J, Geuzaine C, Dular P, Legros W. Application of the fast multipole method to hybrid finite element-boundary element models. J Comput Appl Math 2004;168(1–2):403–12.
[17] Xuan Liang, Zeng Zhiwei, Shanker Balasubramaniam, Udpa Lalita. Meshless method for numerical modelling of pulsed eddy currents. IEEE Trans Magn 2004;40(6):3457–62.
[18] Xuan Liang, Zeng Zhiwei, Shanker Balasubramaniam, Udpa Lalita. Element-free galerkin method for static and quasi-static electromagnetic field computation. IEEE Trans Magn 2004;40(1):12–20.
[19] ANSOFT Corporation. Maxwell EM V10 Manual; 2004. http://www.ansoft.com/
[20] COMSOL Corporation. FEMLAB V3.1 Manual; 2004. http://www.comsol.com/
[21] Al-naemi Faris. Magnetic FEM and NDT: benefits, pitfalls and applications. One day seminar proceedings of magnetics in nondestructive testing; April 2005. p. 8–14.
[22] Turner Larry R. 3-D field computation: the near-triumph of commercial codes. IEEE Trans Magn 1996;32(4):2945–9.
[23] Babbar Vijay, Clapham Lynann. Residual magnetic flux leakage: a possible tool for studying pipeline defects. J Nondestruct Eval 2003; 22(4):117–25.
[24] Udpa S, Udpa L. Eddy current testing—are we at the limits, CD-ROM. Proceedings of 16thWCNDT 2004, Paper Code. 776; August 2004. p. 1–8.

 

                                                                                                        Get ready for KPSS exams